Practice Agreement · NP

Nurse Practitioner Practice Agreement in Idaho

Idaho law does not require a Nurse Practitioner to hold a named agreement with a physician. Practices still use one to define the working relationship; here is what it covers and what the state does require.

Practice authorityIndependent practice
Written agreementNo agreement required
What Idaho calls itNo instrument required
Governing boardIdaho Board of Nursing and the Idaho State Board of Pharmacy
Research date2026-09-03 · clauses 2026-09-03

Idaho is a full-practice-authority (FPA) state for NPs — an NP may evaluate, diagnose, and prescribe (including controlled substances, with DEA/Board of Pharmacy registration) without a collaborating physician, per Idaho Board of Nursing rule (IDAPA 24.34.01).

What a Nurse Practitioner practice agreement covers in Idaho

Governed by the Idaho Board of Nursing and the Idaho State Board of Pharmacy. Each numbered item is a statutory requirement the agreement must satisfy.

  1. Idaho does not require the Nurse Practitioner to enter into a supervision or collaboration agreement with a physician for assessment, diagnosis, treatment, or prescribing, including controlled substances, consistent with Idaho Code §§ 54-1402 and 54-1409. The Nurse Practitioner practices under the Nurse Practitioner's own license.

  2. This Agreement's terms regarding the Nurse Practitioner accordingly serve to define the working relationship, referral pathways, and any Medical Director oversight between the Parties, and are not themselves required by Idaho law as a condition of the Nurse Practitioner's authority to practice.

  3. The agreement on file also carries 1 scope, 1 education, 1 registration clauses, generated in the document itself.

Statutes and rules cited

  1. Idaho Code § 54-1705statute

    Defines 'collaborative pharmacy practice,' 'collaborative pharmacy practice agreement,' and 'drug therapy management' (selecting, initiating, or modifying drug treatment pursuant to such an agreement).

Terms it has to carry

Ratio, proximity, chart review, meeting and prescribing terms the agreement has to carry, from the state's supervision rules.

Proximity

No proximity requirement

No supervising/collaborating physician relationship is required at all for clinical practice or prescribing (IDAPA 24.34.01).

Supervision ratio

Not codified — no cap on file

Chart review

Not codified — left to the agreement

Meeting cadence

Not codified — left to the agreement

Prescriptive authority

Covered by the practice agreement · controlled substances permitted

Full independent prescriptive authority, including controlled substances, subject to standard DEA/Board of Pharmacy registration.

Written agreement

Not required

Unconditional — Idaho NPs never need a physician agreement to practice their full scope.

Practice ownership (corporate practice of medicine)

Non-licensee ownership permitted — Following the Idaho Board of Medicine's 2016 corporate-practice-of-medicine disavowal, an NP may generally hold equity in a standard LLC/corporation, including one also owned by physicians or non-licensees.

Legal sources for these rules (2)
How the relationship works day to day
Who has to be where, how often you meet, and what the physician costs: Nurse Practitioner in Idaho on collaborativeagreement.com.

About Idaho's rules

Idaho APRNs (NP/CRNA/CNM/CNS) have full independent practice authority. The Idaho Board of Medicine formally disavowed corporate-practice-of-medicine enforcement in March 2016 — physicians, NPs, PAs, and (per this research pass) even non-licensees may generally co-own a standard business entity, so long as licensed professionals actually deliver the care.

Other clinicians in Idaho: see the state overview.