Collaborative Practice Agreement · PharmD
Oklahoma Written Collaborative Practice Agreement for Pharmacists
Required. The Written Collaborative Practice Agreement is the written instrument Oklahoma law names for a Pharmacist working with a physician. Below: the board that governs it, what it must contain, and the terms it has to carry.
This research pass could not obtain reliable primary-source access to the Oklahoma Pharmacy Practice Act / Board of Pharmacy rules to confirm the specific structure of Oklahoma's pharmacist collaborative-practice framework (several official ok.gov endpoints were unreachable during this research session). Coded SUPERVISED_ONLY by analogy to every other researched state's expanded-scope pharmacist tier, but this entire entry should be treated as low-confidence and verified directly with the Oklahoma State Board of Pharmacy before use.
What a Oklahoma Written Collaborative Practice Agreement must contain
Governed by the Oklahoma State Board of Pharmacy. Each numbered item is a statutory requirement the agreement must satisfy.
The Pharmacist may practice under a written collaborative practice agreement with the Physician (who must be licensed by the Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision or the Oklahoma Board of Osteopathic Examiners), under which the Pharmacist provides pharmaceutical care and drug therapy management within the scope the agreement defines. The agreement may not authorize anything that would violate state or federal law.
Source: Okla. Admin. Code § 535:10-9-5
- The Written Collaborative Practice Agreement on file also carries 1 scope, 1 registration, 1 authority clauses, generated in the document itself.
Statutes and rules cited
- Okla. Admin. Code § 535:10-9-5regulation
Oklahoma State Board of Pharmacy rule allowing pharmacist-physician collaborative agreements, requiring that a copy be kept on file at the pharmacy and made available to the Board on request, and that the agreement not violate state or federal law. Published in the Board's own compiled Pharmacy Law Book.
Terms it has to carry
Ratio, proximity, chart review, meeting and prescribing terms the agreement has to carry, from the state's supervision rules.
Proximity
Not codified — left to the agreement
Supervision ratio
Not codified — no cap on file
Chart review
Not codified — left to the agreement
Meeting cadence
Not codified — left to the agreement
Prescriptive authority
Separate prescribing terms required · no controlled-substance authority
Not independently confirmed in this research pass — coded False as the conservative default given the absence of a confirmed affirmative grant, not a confirmed statutory bar. This is the lowest-confidence entry in this state's dataset; verify directly with the Oklahoma State Board of Pharmacy before relying on it.
Written agreement
Required
Practice ownership (corporate practice of medicine)
Non-licensee ownership permitted — Not independently confirmed in this research pass — Oklahoma's general absence of a CPOM doctrine (see other providers' entries) makes permissive pharmacy ownership plausible, but pharmacy-specific ownership rules were not located.
Low-confidence entry — verify with the Oklahoma State Board of Pharmacy.
Legal sources for these rules (1)
- Oklahoma Pharmacy Practice Act, Okla. Stat. tit. 59, Ch. 8 (general citation — specific collaborative-practice section not independently confirmed in this research pass)
About Oklahoma's rules
HB 2298 (APRNs) and HB 2584 (PAs), both 2025 and effective Nov. 1, 2025, created new hours-based independent-practice pathways in a state with no prior pathway for either. Being this recent, secondary sources conflict on whether a 6-provider physician-ratio cap (OAC 435:10-13-2) still applies post-reform — flagged per-provider below rather than guessed. Oklahoma has no corporate-practice-of-medicine doctrine (Okla. A.G. Op. 77-168).
Other clinicians in Oklahoma: see the state overview.